TYRANNICAL GOVT LIED AGAIN

I mentioned my skepticism in the post below that there was anything meaningful about the NuGovt's E-Petition gimmick which is more about fooling the public into thinking tyrannical Govt policy is popular rather than any real attempt to put democracy back into the hands of the electorate.



And it looks like my instinct might be right given that Camoron and his EU bought and paid for bunch of ministers have completely dismissed any concerns about our membership of the EU and it's unelected leadership that dictates and enforces Iron Curtain ideology on people who don't want to be its citizens.



For me the biggest insult is to dismiss even a debate on membership if enough signatures are gained on the E Petition scam because:



"Britain delivered a “very clear result” on the issue 36 years ago."



Errr - no we didn't Dave. We delivered a very clear result on the common market and trade - or at least our parents and grandparents did even though they pretty much regretted it straight away when they realised how ridiculous some of the demands were to be. But we have NEVER been asked about political union. We have NEVER been asked if we wanted to sign up to scams like Global Warming or bullying of those in poverty to change their lifestyles in line with the middle and upper class whims of the unelected who now rule us and have destroyed British culture and heritage as well as many other countries in Europe that simply want to be left alone to set their own policies.



I think this monstrosity that no one in Britain or the rest of Europe voted for is even killing the native language of some countries and that is criminal.



When the Westminster Parish Council of the EU can dismiss a debate on our membership when a huge majority of British subjects want it, then what hope for a minority that wants to be treated with equality on issues of lifestyle like smoking and choice? Well, I'm still waiting for a scam E-Petition on that to be accepted.



I think it's got to the stage where there is now no choice. The ONLY hope for this country, for fairness, for equality, for self respect, is to vote UKIP, stand for UKIP, show the corrupt LibLabCon that we have had enough. When the balance of power between state and citizen is restored, and the corrupt MPs in Parliament who ignore their voters realise that we actually do matter, only then will the oppression end.



UPDATE 08/08/11 : In response to this clear snub of the will of the electorate, UKIP leader Nigel Farage said:



"I think we have finally seen the Prime Minister's true colours when it comes to the EU - he's a fan and despite the weak euroscpetic posturing we have witnessed recently by parts of the Conservative Party, it is clear that Mr Cameron has no intention of letting us have our say on future EU membership.



"The argument that the 1975 referendum delivered a clear mandate for membership is incredibly poor. Firstly, that was when the British people were asked about the European Economic Community. Over the last 36 years the EEC has morphed into the EU with its tentacles now reaching far and wide. Secondly, anyone under the age of 53 was not able to vote in 1975. By refusing a referendum it shows utter contempt for a massive chunk of the population."

BREAK OVER

Image from here

Job hunting was getting me down so I decided to step right away from it, take a few days out in the glorious weather we've had here of late and do something different so me and my other half got on our push bikes and looked for something to do out in the nearby countryside.

And we found a veritable treasure of a spot by the riverbank, picked cherries from trees on a public footpath and bemoaned the fact that some woods are private so we couldn't explore further.

My other half made wine and I made jam and in the spirit of good weather, we cycled some 36 miles in a few days. The best news is we can still walk as we haven't stiffened up from using muscles that were last used on how ever many nice days we had last summer which brought about the same urge for physical exercise.

Now the rain is back, it's time to get back to jobhunting. Lack of funds means I won't get to this year's UKIP conference nor will I be able to make this event in Manchester or any of the fringe events organised for the Conservative Party Conference in a bid to make the Tories listen that their persecution of people's lifestyles is ruining more than just the economy and long held British traditions.

During my latest absence from blogging, I've logged back into this virtual world occasionally to check the latest outrages and have much to say about Govts which seeks to destroy legal industry by giving a monopoly to one industry over another.

And I could also write reams on the confirmation that the EU is a dictatorship that ignores its so-called citizens in favour of Iron Curtain ideology, and my disappointment that Smoker heroes Philip Davies and David Nuttall would both want to see the reintroduction of state murder but the job hunting calls so I'll leave that for another day.

Meanwhile, I'm hoping that I will at least have enough cash to go on this trip which is one not to be missed and probably the last trip I'll be able to make until next summer - job permitting of course.

PRISONER AND MIGRANT EQUALITY

I'm working away from home most days and from Wednesday the travel to work time is up to an hour and a half each way. That doesn't leave me with much energy to blog when I get home especially during the latter half of the week. That means I miss my chance to rant when something in the news breaks that pisses me off.

It also means that sometimes those things I observe during my present daily routine are pushed to the back of my mind until the urge to blog strikes.

This week I heard about the EU ruling that gives prisoners the right to vote and all the critical comments made about that.

My own view is that some prisoners should. One person's "criminal" is another person's "political prisoner." Pub landlord Nick Hogan for example. If he had been forced to stay locked up for the whole of the six months he would have missed the election. He was locked up simply because smoking is a political issue and he was made an example of. He took no one's human right. He offered it. Choice.

I would not like to see child killers, murderers, rapists and fraudsters able to choose the next party of power. Some say they should be treated as humans and not monsters. I say they took away the human rights of their victims. God might forgive them one day but that is not our job.

I think the policy will be exploited by the BNP who target the underclass on sink estates whose lifestyles continuously bring them into conflict with the law. That can only be a bad move. I think to avert the threat of a rise in BNP support, UKIP must find a way of engaging and involving the underclass who feel powerless and victimised.

The other piece of news that caught my attention was the EU ruling that the UK has to treat Migrants fairer by giving them benefits earlier. It brought to mind a case I saw at court involving an Eastern European migrant.

He got 14 weeks for shop theft and was let out after serving half of his sentence which is normal UK practice with all offenders as is giving them £90 when they are released.

The migrant used his £90 quid discharge grant to get somewhere to live on the day he came out. With no work or money he went shop lifting again, got caught and ended up back before the court. The magistrates were told that if they sent him back to prison then he'd be in the same position when he came out.

The solicitor said : "It wouldn't achieve anything positive and would only result in more of a burden on the tax payer."

The bench sent him back to jail to serve the last seven weeks and imposed another four. I wonder how much that's costing. I wonder why we can't send these people back when they fall into drugs and crime. We are doing them no favours here. We have nothing to offer. I don't see the benefit to them or the UK of EU migration.

BOSTON - THE CENTRE OF EASTERN EUROPE

I'm currently covering Boston Magistrates court and it's proving to be quite an education in Eastern European culture.

All but two of the defendants that I reported on this morning were foreign from Latvia, Russia or Poland and one Brazilian. It was a right hard job to get those names spelled correctly but thank God for court lists.

Mind you, I noted that each defendant had a slightly different spelling to their names as AKAs and I wonder if this is just the police hedging their bets in the hope that at least one version is correct.

One of he English defendants - a woman - also had a very odd spelling of her first name Letitcia AKA Letitica. I must admit I felt a bit sorry for her although she should not have barged in on a police arrest and she accepted that and got fined heavily for it.

A copper gave her a "knee strike" which I think must be another Home Office approved way of beating up the public but I felt it was a bit harsh. She lashed out and didn't intend to kick the officer in the groin (is that another way of saying bollocks?) and she ended up paying him £75 in compensation because he was "a bit sore."

His legitimate knee-strike on her left her with both knees swelled and very sore and I just wonder if this sort of heavy handed treatment is absolutely necessary or if it's coppers being bullies because they can.

I don't blame the police for using these tremendous powers against the public because the Govt has allowed for them to be bruisers by law. I think the Govt had in mind more serious criminals when they approved these sort of measures but this woman was mid 40s, a bit fat, and not the sort you'd expect would be too much for a man to handle.

Yes, yes, I know I'm probably being sexist but men are made stronger - especially when they train like police officers and women are weaker - especially when they don't. I think this sort of physical control method was given to the police to deal with yobs and hard men and not silly women getting in the way.

It's a bit like the proceeds of crime act. It was intended to get millions or thousands of pounds of criminal assets from the Mr Bigs who as far a I can tell still get away with it while a bloke who nicks a guitar and returns it, and a golf bag with clubs, and returns those, is sent up to crown court under the proceeds of crime act. Why? It wasn't said but it seems very odd to me. OK - he was a slimeball who stole a few quid out of a charity box as well - which wasn't recovered - but still that was not the reason for the law being imposed.

I've also seen a burglar addict without two pennies to rub together being jailed under proceeds of crime act when it's quite clear he's pretty useless at what he does, always gets caught, and hasn't made a buck from his bungled attempts. What this act does, it appeares to me, is allow for bully state revenge on little people like him because they can't get the big ones and it makes it look as if they're "doing something" about crime.

12 years of reporting the petty criminal courts is enough to make anyone lose faith in British Justice, its laws, its enforcers, and its courts.