Phil Williams explains how the NuGovt was conned by the self-interest cronies appointed by the last Govt which the public kicked out of office.
This is yet further evidence that the ConDems are totally naive and stupid and will believe any old tripe put forward by Labour's civil servants who despite a general election, are still making policies that the majority of non-smoking and smoking voters rejected at the ballot box.
They want choice, equality, to be treated as grown ups, and to be allowed to decide for themselves where they socialise and who with. The NuGovt doesn't care about the voter which is why I believe it will lose the next election. People are already fed up and if they do not do something to address the very real concerns of freedom of choice v dictatorship, then they are finished as parties.
Tory supporters are already hanging their heads in embarrassment at this "socialist" NuConservative party and frankly, the LibDems have become a laughing stock. If they do not change their bigoted stance on smokers, then other parties will get the support that might have gone their way
They've lied to their core support - students - and their once in their history go at being in Govt has only shown that they are no alternative. The hopes people had in them to be "different" from the other two main parties has only been exposed as false and built on nothing more substantial that straw.
Yes, the Lib Dems are finished as a party. I think some will stay with the Tories as the best hope of keeping their fat salaries. Others will join NuLabour - and as that thoroughly corrupt party has bragged - in the thousands.
The only decent LibDems I know are Coun Carl Minns from Hull and the Mayor of Market Rasen, Ken Bridger. I wish they'd both see sense and cross over. Ken I know is very much an ordinary bloke trying to do good. From what I have learned of Carl, I feel he is the same. UKIP needs more people like that. Their talents are wasted with their party of choice.
I recall Dudley UKIP councillor Malcolm Davis - who crossed over from the LibDems - said he was disillusioned with his former party and many more feel like he does.
UKIP can become the new party of the people for the people. It is growing from the bottom up and is taking support from the LibLabCon party. It is not full of "nazi brownshirts" as jealous critics put out to scare away support. It's full of people fed up at being ignored over all sorts of issues - the smoking ban being the one that affects 12 million potential voters.
The media also criticises UKIP because its prospective MPs are ordinary people so fed up with the LibLabCon dictatorship, that they have taken matters into their own hands in a bid to get that change that Britain so desperately needs if she is to survive, and her people are to remain free.
They are not slick politicians trained in the art of lying. They are honest men and women who tell it as they see it. They may say things people don't like - but at least they know what they are voting for.
Currently the main parties are making Britons that thing they said they'd never be - slaves.
Showing posts with label NuLab. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NuLab. Show all posts
Monday, January 31, 2011
Friday, November 5, 2010
IF THE GLOVE FITS ...
No UK leader has ever been despised more than Tony Blair. He raised our hopes, he lied, he stabbed us in the back. He took our kids to an illegal war. He is responsible for the death of millions of innocents and the destruction of their homes and property.
He sold us out, stripped us of our pride and civil liberties, and then walked away and left that dictator Brown to finish the job of bringing us to our knees.
Having done the damage, Blair then walked away and turned his back on the country he once said he cared for "with every sinew" of his sweaty body. I felt like puking when he used that kind of clichéd hyperbole. Now he is making money off it with his memoirs.
There is a suggestion that Blair's new book is in the wrong section of the bookshop and should be moved to crime or treason. It seems to have caught on and the British are showing their hatred of this former leader and everything he stood for in a subtle and dignified way by simply moving books from one shelf to another.
Meanwhile one of the creeps he left behind in his NuParty has been having a bit of bother.
The news that Phil Woolas is the same kind of lying cheat as his former boss comes as no surprise. Nulabour must be the most corrupt party for almost 100 years.
The former champions of the disaffected, the broken, the beaten and the wretched, that three generations of my family supported, has been reduced to a gang of tyrants and thugs who are more concerned with the cut of their suits.
NuLabour hammered its core working class support to gain the votes in seats that mattered under an unfair voting system. It's leaders shamed us and dragged us into an economic mire to bribe sleepwalkers into keeping them in power for 13 long years.
The British sleeping lion is beginning to wake. His yawn will become a roar and I hope it's heard at the by election forced by Woolas's deception. The outcome and the first test of this new ConDem coalition will be fascinating to watch. I hope they get what they deserve for all their broken promises and shallow lies.
For me the only political answer to start putting some real passion into solving the country's problems is UKIP. Former supporters of the LibLabCon party are drifting over to UKIP as the only hope of gaining back some self respect and pride.
It's great to see that Nigel Farage made it back as UKIP leader and with such huge support from members of the party. He's a great orator and he carries the crowd with him. If anyone in the party can win a seat in Parliament, then it's Farage.
He seems a normal down to earth and decent sort of bloke and his presence would shake the foundations of that exclusive Parliament club.
Thursday, July 8, 2010
AND WHILE I'M ON THE SUBJECT
I also hate banks.
Mine wrote to me today to say it will no longer pay interest on many of their accounts which are in credit. Two of mine are affected. Who wants to bet they haven't abolished taking interest in loans or overdrafts?
It brings to mind a story I was told last week by a young family with one small child. They struggle on a hand to mouth state existence and both the mum and dad desperately want jobs but without skills, and in a city full of cheap students willing to work at odd hours and migrants taking up the kind of unskilled work they would once have done, they can't get work.
They inadvertently went 35 pence over drawn at the bank the other week. They have no choice but for their meagre benefit to be paid into a bank account anymore. As a result, they found a week later that the bank was charging them £60 for the mistake. This when the couple don't even have an overdraft facility.
This couple was lucky because they had family who would help them out of this mess. Had they not, the £60 week benefit that they live on would have been paid in, swallowed up by the thieving bank, and their child would have gone hungry. No doubt they would then have been persecuted by the state for child neglect and basically just for being poor.
It all stinks. That is NuLab's legacy. Persecution of the poor that the party was originally founded to help. Don't they make you sick. Do I expect things to be different for those on low income under the ConDem party? Absolutely not. I fear that people are going to die under this adminstration simply because they can't afford to live and this new adminstration doesn't care as long as it can save money.
Mine wrote to me today to say it will no longer pay interest on many of their accounts which are in credit. Two of mine are affected. Who wants to bet they haven't abolished taking interest in loans or overdrafts?
It brings to mind a story I was told last week by a young family with one small child. They struggle on a hand to mouth state existence and both the mum and dad desperately want jobs but without skills, and in a city full of cheap students willing to work at odd hours and migrants taking up the kind of unskilled work they would once have done, they can't get work.
They inadvertently went 35 pence over drawn at the bank the other week. They have no choice but for their meagre benefit to be paid into a bank account anymore. As a result, they found a week later that the bank was charging them £60 for the mistake. This when the couple don't even have an overdraft facility.
This couple was lucky because they had family who would help them out of this mess. Had they not, the £60 week benefit that they live on would have been paid in, swallowed up by the thieving bank, and their child would have gone hungry. No doubt they would then have been persecuted by the state for child neglect and basically just for being poor.
It all stinks. That is NuLab's legacy. Persecution of the poor that the party was originally founded to help. Don't they make you sick. Do I expect things to be different for those on low income under the ConDem party? Absolutely not. I fear that people are going to die under this adminstration simply because they can't afford to live and this new adminstration doesn't care as long as it can save money.
Thursday, April 15, 2010
THESBIAN DEBATES FUEL
I was asked to appear with the three main candidates in what I thought was a hustings event in Woodhall Spa by Lincolnshire local BBC TV news programme Look North.
I was looking forward to getting my teeth into my first debate with real politicians but when I arrived at Moreton's Service Station on the B1191, I found that there was a candidate from the Lincolnshire Independents, Lincolnshire First party and the Labour blokie Patrick Mountain. We were to discuss "transport."
However, as the three of us stood by the chilly roadside, waiting for the cameras to roll, and I tried to rehearse in my head all of the great UKIP policies on transport , I was rather put off by Patrick loosening his voice with a scale of notes.
BBC interveiwer Tim Iredale looked at him surprised and Patrick piped up that he was "practising".
"It's what you do before going on air, isn't it?" he asked.
Iredale said : "Why, are you a thesbian?"
Pat Nurse (under her breath) : "Plenty of those in the Labour Party, I think."
Anyway, cameras began to roll and instead of discussing transport, it was one question : "What would UKIP do for the motorist in the face of rising fuel costs?"
I said the party intended to give a windfall tax rebate to the motorist. Iredale asked me where the money was coming from. It would be linked to the price of oil. I said that obviously the billions we waste by being a member of the EUSSR would also come in handy and UKIP is the only party willing to give the British people a say in whether they wanted this money in the Britain's pocket or Brussels. Only they can tell us whether they want in or out.
It seems I will get that chance for debate tommorrow morning on BBC Radio Lincolnshire. I am to debate all sorts of issues with all seven candidates including the three old parties, the BNP, the English Democrats and the LiLf party.
WHY I ENTERED POLITICS
People often ask why and this is the reason. I believe in free choice and I'm against Govt dictatorship.
Tuesday, April 6, 2010
NOW FOR SOMETHING MORE SERIOUS
According to Chiiiildren's Secretary ED Balls, there will be tough choices on whether to protect school funding and this will be at the heart of the General Election.
I've always thought that there is more wrong with our education system then just funding. It is too uniform and doesn't allow for individualism and it aims to take the child from the parent and educate it for the state.
UKIP's view, and I agree, is that NuLabour has forgotten that it has been in power for 13 years.
“They can’t bang-on about the need for reform in the education sector without expecting people to wonder what on Earth they’ve been doing in the last 13 years that’s left it in such a state," said a Party spokesman.
“The tories have remained very vague about what they’d do, (no surprise there, they've given hardly any detail on any of their policies) and the Liberals have said their priority would be to target resources at the under-achievers.
“UKIP would not ignore any group of school students, whether they were low, middle or high achievers.
“We would encourage the return of Grammar schools (without the 11 plus) and develop schools where the less academic students could be taught more vocational subjects, reach their full potential, and have vastly increased employability.”
Yes, some students, no matter how the system tries to shape them, will always be like square pegs being thrust into round holes. We need an education system that really does give parents power, choice and accountability. It seems to be the only people accountable for all that is wrong in today's system is the parents themselves. An easy target to blame for all of society's ills when parents do know what's best for their children, despite what the NuLabour state thinks.
The Tories really are no better. They have a lack of vision and are not clear on any policy. Take their claims that they could fund a cancer drug from NI contributions, for example. A think tank doesn't agree and neither does UKIP
“This is an exceptionally cynical piece of tory spin," a spokesman said.
“The NHS budget won’t be increased to fund the rise in NI, so the one percent increase will have to be met by the existing budget arrangements.
“The tories seem to forget that the money for the rise is currently being spent in other areas of the NHS, and is therefore not available to be spent elsewhere.
“The Labour NI rise is going to damage job prospects in the UK, but that does not give licence to the tories to mislead the public in this underhand way.
“The solution to the issue of NI is glaringly obvious, abolish it.
“UKIP would abolish this ‘tax on jobs’ and introduce a flat rate tax on earnings above the minimum wage. It’s cheaper, it’s easier, it’s fairer."
For more on UKIP's policies see HERE
I've always thought that there is more wrong with our education system then just funding. It is too uniform and doesn't allow for individualism and it aims to take the child from the parent and educate it for the state.
UKIP's view, and I agree, is that NuLabour has forgotten that it has been in power for 13 years.
“They can’t bang-on about the need for reform in the education sector without expecting people to wonder what on Earth they’ve been doing in the last 13 years that’s left it in such a state," said a Party spokesman.
“The tories have remained very vague about what they’d do, (no surprise there, they've given hardly any detail on any of their policies) and the Liberals have said their priority would be to target resources at the under-achievers.
“UKIP would not ignore any group of school students, whether they were low, middle or high achievers.
“We would encourage the return of Grammar schools (without the 11 plus) and develop schools where the less academic students could be taught more vocational subjects, reach their full potential, and have vastly increased employability.”
Yes, some students, no matter how the system tries to shape them, will always be like square pegs being thrust into round holes. We need an education system that really does give parents power, choice and accountability. It seems to be the only people accountable for all that is wrong in today's system is the parents themselves. An easy target to blame for all of society's ills when parents do know what's best for their children, despite what the NuLabour state thinks.
The Tories really are no better. They have a lack of vision and are not clear on any policy. Take their claims that they could fund a cancer drug from NI contributions, for example. A think tank doesn't agree and neither does UKIP
“This is an exceptionally cynical piece of tory spin," a spokesman said.
“The NHS budget won’t be increased to fund the rise in NI, so the one percent increase will have to be met by the existing budget arrangements.
“The tories seem to forget that the money for the rise is currently being spent in other areas of the NHS, and is therefore not available to be spent elsewhere.
“The Labour NI rise is going to damage job prospects in the UK, but that does not give licence to the tories to mislead the public in this underhand way.
“The solution to the issue of NI is glaringly obvious, abolish it.
“UKIP would abolish this ‘tax on jobs’ and introduce a flat rate tax on earnings above the minimum wage. It’s cheaper, it’s easier, it’s fairer."
For more on UKIP's policies see HERE
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
WHAT'S THE POINT OF THE PUB MINISTER?
Dick Puddlecote writes a great piece HERE about new pub minister John Healey and his record at work since taking on the role.
I'm still smarting at Healey's refusal to speak to one of our representatives, Simon Clark from Forest. A better candidate for this role would be anyone once NuLab has been shown the back door by the electorate.
I'm still smarting at Healey's refusal to speak to one of our representatives, Simon Clark from Forest. A better candidate for this role would be anyone once NuLab has been shown the back door by the electorate.
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
CRIME OF THE CENTURY
This is about as low as a country can get when dealing with its citizens
First it has to make a ridiculous law to criminalise law abiding people, then it ensures that there is no way that citizens can abide by it, then it steals as much as it can in fines to employ an army of jobsworths because its economy is so bad, there isn't any private enterprise to drag it out of recession.
Labour has spent 13 years employing half of the country to spy on and prosecute the other half. It is time this Govt was gone. We have no freedoms left. Labour has stolen everything from us. Vote in May and kick these self-interest nutters out. Perhaps when they have gone, some sanity and self respect may at last begin to return to this once great country of ours!
Anyone would think that the decent businesswoman above who has run a shop for 28 years in Manchester was the worst paedophile from hell and not an innocent great granny who likes to sell goldfish to children who want pets. Oh, I forgot, NuLabour tends to let serious criminals like that off the hook while persecuting and marginalising normal people who just want to be left alone to live their lives in peace.
ARROGANT LABOUR NOT WORTH SUPPORT
It was with some apprehension that I heard Simon Clark from Forest - the Freedom Organisation for the Right to Enjoy Smoking Tobacco - and the leader of the Save Our Pubs and Clubs amendthesmokingban.com campaign ,was due to meet the pubs minister John Healey to talk about the negative impact of the legislation on the hospitality industry.
Smokers and non-smokers poured out their hearts on Simon's blog in the vain hope that one of their so-called govt representatives would actually give a shit about what they thought.
However, true to form no arrogant Labour minister cares what the people think nor would one care to listen on this issue because they never have before. Labour is also happy to throw away the 12 million votes from smokers that it has ignored, dehumanised, discriminated against, and persecuted, especially during the last three years.
But Simon is a great bloke, a non-smoker, and he is one of the very few representatives we have. If Govt listens to anyone on our side then Simon is that person. He did have a meeting organised for today but the pubs minister decided to snub him - perhaps unike our nemesis ASH, Simon didn't go armed with pocket loads of cash for dodgy "research" that told the minister what he wanted to hear. He went instead with emotional heartfelt pleas from ordinary people just asking for their lives back. Not worth a fig to Labour, it would seem!
Labout treats its core support with utter contempt and that is why it has lost it. Vote Labour at your peril, whatever your issue, because if the Govt doesn't agree with you, it will marginalise you and exclude you. The Labour party doesn't deserve the respect of the people of Britain let alone the vote. It is time this self-serving excuse for a working man's friend was chased to the fringes where it belongs.
Now that Tony Bliar, the oil-loving, war mongering twerp who brought Britain to her knees and is responsible for the death of thousands of our young men, is back on the campaign trail just in time to remind people why they hate NuLabour so much - not that many had forgotten. Bliar's appearance just reminds the voter why they must not vote Labour ever again!
Despicable!
http://takingliberties.squarespace.com/taking-liberties/2010/3/30/minister-refuses-to-meet-the-man-from-forest.html
Smokers and non-smokers poured out their hearts on Simon's blog in the vain hope that one of their so-called govt representatives would actually give a shit about what they thought.
However, true to form no arrogant Labour minister cares what the people think nor would one care to listen on this issue because they never have before. Labour is also happy to throw away the 12 million votes from smokers that it has ignored, dehumanised, discriminated against, and persecuted, especially during the last three years.
But Simon is a great bloke, a non-smoker, and he is one of the very few representatives we have. If Govt listens to anyone on our side then Simon is that person. He did have a meeting organised for today but the pubs minister decided to snub him - perhaps unike our nemesis ASH, Simon didn't go armed with pocket loads of cash for dodgy "research" that told the minister what he wanted to hear. He went instead with emotional heartfelt pleas from ordinary people just asking for their lives back. Not worth a fig to Labour, it would seem!
Labout treats its core support with utter contempt and that is why it has lost it. Vote Labour at your peril, whatever your issue, because if the Govt doesn't agree with you, it will marginalise you and exclude you. The Labour party doesn't deserve the respect of the people of Britain let alone the vote. It is time this self-serving excuse for a working man's friend was chased to the fringes where it belongs.
Now that Tony Bliar, the oil-loving, war mongering twerp who brought Britain to her knees and is responsible for the death of thousands of our young men, is back on the campaign trail just in time to remind people why they hate NuLabour so much - not that many had forgotten. Bliar's appearance just reminds the voter why they must not vote Labour ever again!
Despicable!
http://takingliberties.squarespace.com/taking-liberties/2010/3/30/minister-refuses-to-meet-the-man-from-forest.html
Sunday, March 28, 2010
PRICELESS!
This is priceless. Vote for the blogosphere - vote Old Holborn. If none of the Ukippers, libertarians or independents get in to Parliament, this man absolutely must!
He'll at least keep us laughing while the establishment rips the shirts off our backs - oh, I forgot. OH has already sent them all to Gordon!
He'll at least keep us laughing while the establishment rips the shirts off our backs - oh, I forgot. OH has already sent them all to Gordon!
Sunday, February 28, 2010
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
LABOUR BETRAYED THE POOR
Tony Blair said Labour would be judged on how it dealt with the poorest people in British society and it's record shows that it robbed them, and conned them in exactly the way it has conned everyone in this country so that Blair and his favourties could stuff their own pockets with money - tons of it.
This report on last night's Newsnight http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/8480636.stm on the redevelopment - or regeneration to use Blair's newspeak - in Salford and Ordsall, reveals that Labour robbed the poor to pay the rich. They stole the working classes houses, their heritage, their history, and gave them to the highest bidding developers, and then shoved decent hard working people into crap tenements, or new houses which they make them pay through the nose for.
This party has crapped on its core support. I hope these honourable working class people get ther revenge at the next election but it will be no good looking to the Tories or the illiberal demotwats to put things right. These two parties also have their own interests at heart.
The most gut-wrenchingly sickening thing about this report is the salesman's con given by none other than the cheating munchkin herself - Hazel Blears.
In short, Blair, you ripped us off, you excluded us, you priced us out of education, and if hanging is ever brought back to this country, the first on the gallows should be Bliar and all of his favourite ministers who lied for him, conned for him, sold us down the river for him, and sent our young men to die for him.
Despicable is the only response I have to this bunch of self-serving gobshites who betrayed us all.
Saturday, January 9, 2010
Friday, January 8, 2010
AN OPINION REVISITED
As I've just written on this issue for a local publication, I thought it might be good to share this piece below which was written two years ago and revisted today.
________________________________________________________________
The Govt is taking sides by introducing the smoking ban and the result is legal justification of discrimination and exclusion against a minority group, argues lifelong smoker Pat Nurse.
________________________________________________________________
In the years before July 1st last year, when the spectre of the smoking ban hung in the air like a putrid smell, I made my own feeble stand against it by refusing to go to any restaurants, cafes, pubs, public halls, hotels and centres that didn’t have facilities for smokers.
I also complained when confronted with offensive signs in some no-smoking establishments such as “For the comfort of ALL our customers, this is a no-smoking café..” and “Smoking is prohibited because it spoils the taste of our coffee..“
I politely pointed out that this is clearly not the case in either circumstance for smoking customers who are obviously not welcome in such places. I also argued that a simple neutral sign saying “No Smoking” was less offensive and a perfectly adequate message.
I naively believed that other smokers, and tolerant non-smokers, would take this same stance, that they would add their voice to the debate and the consultation, and the Government would be persuaded that a ban was bad for business and a total smoking ban, as opposed to a well ventilated choice, went against Britain’s internationally renowned “just, equal, and tolerant society.“
When the Govt announced the blanket ban, and said smokers didn’t have the right to go out and kill other people, and we should be made to stop for our own good, it was like a kick in the teeth.
I was in despair at how my Government could take sides with anti-smoking groups who over the previous 40 years had engaged in a long, oppressive and scurrilous campaign aimed at making me hate myself and others hate me even more because I like tobacco.
My objections to the smoking ban have never been about not being able to smoke, or not having the right to smoke where I like. They have always been based on my view that a ban gives justification to intolerance towards people who like to do things that others don’t. .. even if what they do doesn’t harm anyone else.
The anti-smoking lobby has successfully persuaded Government that smokers are suicidal serial killers and ministers seem to have taken no account that for every study that says passive smoking is harmful to others there are many more that say it isn’t.
The Government shouldn’t be taking sides or giving my taxes via the NHS to campaigns that ostracise me. It certainly shouldn’t create legislation in support of one side of an argument that hasn’t yet been proved, but unfairly discriminates against a minority group of people, and in particular a smaller proportion, like me, who say smoking is embedded in their culture.
I’ve rarely been out since the smoking ban. I don’t feel welcome and I’m not comfortable in places where I can’t smoke. I don’t see the fun in being banished to the cold outside whenever I want a cigarette. It makes me feel “dirty” , excluded and undignified. Dogs are more welcome inside a hotel or a pub these days than smokers.
Kicking smokers outside has, in my opinion, only made things worse for those who hate smoking. Before the ban, we were contained in special designated areas where no-one was affected except those who smoked and those who worked there.
Now, the smell of smoke is constantly on the streets, and smokers, non-smokers and anti-smokers mix on nice days in beer or restaurant gardens and there is friction.
No-one wants to return to the days when smoking was allowed everywhere, but let’s have balance. Let people choose whether they want to go to smoking or non-smoking establishments, and let workers decide which of these they want to work in.
The current situation has just forced us all together which can only lead to outright war. If a ban is disproportionably extended to outside areas, then people like me will become even more reclusive.
I believe the ban has also promoted smoking in a way we haven’t seen since the old days when tobacco companies were allowed to advertise.
I’m starting to see huge signs appear in the street such as “Heated smoking garden here..“ and with smoking and yet more possible restrictions in the news almost every day, the issue is brought to the attention of children and young people in way it never has before.
Pubs, clubs, restaurants, hotels and private enterprise should be allowed to make their own choices. What is wrong with choice? It should never be a radical idea in a democratic society.
I would never give up smoking. I’ve done it all my life. A smoker is who I am and I don‘t wish to be different to please other people. I don’t smoke less because of the ban. I smoke more in protest although I’ve threatened to give up for the first time in 40 years only if the smoking ban is fully reversed!
I don’t go outside with a cigarette in my hand like a serial killer with an axe looking for victims. Personally, I’ve always been a polite smoker, recognising that some people don’t like it and good manners are important.
Before the hate campaign against smokers began, I always asked before lighting up if the person next to me objected. Most times they didn’t, and if they did, I was happy to move. Even before the latest offensive “dirty chucker” campaign I always disposed of my cigarette ends in a bin. I don’t drop any kind of litter and never have because I respect my environment.
The litter campaign of the 1970s had a lifelong impact on me. This sort of campaign, along with a reminder to smokers to employ good manners when around those who don’t like smoke, would have been a far more positive way to attack the “sin” without demonising the “sinner.“
If this had been done, perhaps both smokers and anti--smokers would now be more tolerant of each other.
I’ve watched as the war on smokers has got nastier, infecting the public with fear over their good health, which in turn has led to prejudice and a stereo-typical image of smokers as dirty, uncaring, and selfish people. Inevitably, we are now seeing discrimination against smokers because of such a shameful campaign.
First it was the NHS that began to be selective about treating smokers, who have a right to health services they pay for through taxes, and then some employers began to discriminate by employing non-smokers only and in some cases sacking workers simply because they smoked even if it had nothing to do with their ability to do the job they were paid for.
The smoking ban adds credence, legal and moral justification to the above and that is why, in my opinion, the Health Act is such a bad piece of legislation. To misquote singer Tracy Chapman : “Please give my honest regards to the (minister) for disregarding me” .
I feel that is exactly what Patricia Hewitt and Labour did when they introduced this spiteful ban and my vote will reflect this. I hope other smokers angry at their shabby treatment will choose wisely and not vote in more of the same from any of the three main parties who don’t seem to care about smokers and can’t understand what all the fuss is about.
Many smokers are angry about being ignored, neglected, rejected and demonised. They will use their vote at the next election and if they are like me, it certainly won’t be for New Labour who have proved how much they dislike me and my kind. The party that gets my vote will be the one that proposes to treat me like an adult human being.
We may be in the minority but our combined 12 million votes could make the difference between whether a party wins or loses the next election. Those that want the smokers’ vote, in my opinion, should look at the whole smoking issue afresh and with impartiality.
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
ERM ... ACTUALLY ...
I think, Mr White, that there is only one vermin, blood-sucking parasite bleeding this country's subjects dry and it's called the current Labour Govt.
So do us all favour, leave the Queen alone. She's a nice old dear and I, for one, would hate if she wasn't here and we ended up with President Brown - or God help us president Cameron.
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20091117/tuk-labour-candidate-s-attack-on-queen-6323e80.html
It's such a shame that jumped up prats full of their own self-importance, and with a chip as huge as the ugly scars NuLab has carved through Britain, could even be considered as a PPC. It just goes to show that they really are scraping the bottom of the barrel when it comes to political talent.
So do us all favour, leave the Queen alone. She's a nice old dear and I, for one, would hate if she wasn't here and we ended up with President Brown - or God help us president Cameron.
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20091117/tuk-labour-candidate-s-attack-on-queen-6323e80.html
It's such a shame that jumped up prats full of their own self-importance, and with a chip as huge as the ugly scars NuLab has carved through Britain, could even be considered as a PPC. It just goes to show that they really are scraping the bottom of the barrel when it comes to political talent.
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
WELCOME TO THE COMMUNIST STATE
How much worse can things get!
Whoever said we lived in a free country didn't reckon on Britons ever getting the tyrannical Government that we have now.
My only question is will anything change after the next election when we have finally shown the NuLabour dictatorship the door?
I am so cynical, that I very much doubt it - unless UKIP win, of course!
Read it and fear : http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/6534319/State-to-spy-on-every-phone-call-email-and-web-search.html
Whoever said we lived in a free country didn't reckon on Britons ever getting the tyrannical Government that we have now.
My only question is will anything change after the next election when we have finally shown the NuLabour dictatorship the door?
I am so cynical, that I very much doubt it - unless UKIP win, of course!
Read it and fear : http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/6534319/State-to-spy-on-every-phone-call-email-and-web-search.html
Sunday, October 4, 2009
WHY WE HATE NULABOUR
This : http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20091004/tuk-the-simpsons-join-obesity-battle-6323e80.html is just one reason why we hate NuLabour.
And here are several more devilshly outlined by Old Holborn. http://bastardoldholborn.blogspot.com/2009/10/under-new-management.html
Thursday, October 1, 2009
LIES, FALSEHOODS AND FEAR - THE NULAB CONFERENCE
You can imagine my response, therefore, to Gordon Brown's suggested policy of locking up young pregnant mums because he believes them to be children having children. ... and I thought the days of the Magdalene Homes were long gone!
GB said that it was quite wrong for these young pregnant "children" to be given council homes and then left without support. Let me just address that myth. Pregnant teens these days DO NOT get council homes and I know because of having a pregnant teen myself three years ago. The council's view on homeless pregnant teens is quite simple - "live on the streets and we'll have your child off you thank you very much and give it to someone we think is more worthy of being a parent"
I'd also like to add that if I had a pregnant teen, and the jackboot gestapo NuLab jobsworths came to my house to get her and my grandchild, then they would get a lot more than they bargained for and I might just end up in court!
This is all knee-jerk reaction to the Baby P case. These sort of cases are very much in the minority. Most young, skint, unsupported, single mums on benefit do a damn good job but when do they ever get praise? One Baby P case and suddenly they are all potential child abusers. This issue really does need to be put in context.
I wasn't impressed by NuLab's roll of policies which Gordon thinks have improved this country. Most of them he reeled off made me cringe and most of them are the reason I have turned away from the party for good. There is nothing NuLab can do to get my vote back. I am too angry but at least now that the Sun has stabbed NuLab in the back, at least I can get some comfort in knowing that they now know how it feels.
Strange that there was no mention of their pet project to save the lives of miiiiiilllions of people - the blanket smoking ban. For half a second I wondered if it would be among the U Turns Gordon announced but then immediately thought "of course not". Those middle class bunch of twerps are just too sanctimonious and arrogant to even realise what a huge mistake that legislation is.
I did spot quite a lot of people walking about in the background during TV interviews with various politicians who could only be described as "obese" and I wondered why on earth they would support a party that if elected again would probably sign their death warrants if they don't slim down to a perfect 10 - for their own good, of course!
I was hugely disappointed to hear that the Old Labour stalwart Dennis Skinner has also lost his roots. He voted moderately for the blanket smoking ban but when he was approached at the NuLabour conference by the Amendthesmokingban campaigners, and told of the devastation the ban is causing the pub industry, his response was, apparently : "I don't go into pubs". I think this is a view many Nu and Old Lab people have. Now I see that "I'm alright, Jack" has always been their ideology.
Finally, the other issue that came out of conference chilled me to the bone. Was it the Balls person who said BNP teachers should be rooted out of schools, and presumably flogged, beaten, executed, and locked up for not preaching NuLab ideology instead?
Don't get me wrong. I DO NOT support the BNP in any way because of the racist aspect of their party membership, although I do understand where they are coming from in terms of the "indigenous" people of Britain often getting a raw deal. I believe in free speech as long as it doesn't slag people off for who they are or what culture they come from, and I despair that we can't all be united Britons no matter what colour or creed we are. Discrimination is encouraged by this Govt which is too self absorbed to know the true meaning of the word. Blanket Smoking Ban - need I say more?
I think NuLab's fear that our schools are overflowing with BNP activists is rather paranoid in any event. But what really concerns me is that I honestly, and probably naively, believed that we had a law in this country that protected people from losing their jobs because of their political beliefs. What if NuLab gets elected again? Will it make a new law preventing UKIP, or even Conservatives or LibDems from being teachers? The rise in support for the BNP may be a problem but I don't think outing alleged BNP teachers is the way to address it.
The only way to overcome this problem is for the three main parties to get their heads out of their arses and start listening to those white voters who feel abandoned, disenfranchised and discriminated against. Debating with the BNP and showing that party up for what it is will, in my opinion, be the better way of beating it and outing its racist ideology. Silencing the party, or making it's members and supporters feel victimised, will only give credence to the BNP's political stance and make its members martyrs. Better that its views are aired so that people can see exactly why they should not vote BNP now or in the future. If the three main parties play their cards right, there should be no need for the BNP in Britain.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)